Television – the new Web

These days a website is a necessity for any established brand and for many marketing managers a mobile strategy is now equally important. Whilst TV has always offered a powerful broadcast advertising outlet, it has been an expensive and limited tool. All this is about to change.


Broadband connected TVs with open internet access present an opportunity for businesses and brands to hold a direct relationship with the consumer through arguably the most influential of all the three screens.


Yet there is still the challenge of how to use the medium effectively. This article aims to give an insight many of the key aspects to consider if you want to get into the connected TV market or assess its potential.

Read More »

Posted in connected TV | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Connected TV – The next application play

Connected TV – The next application play


When did you last attend a ‘Digital Convergence’ conference?    I’ve just got back from one which had the usual mix of internet, mobile and telco delegates and what surprised me the most was the number of tunes that were being replayed.


The one theme I was most surprised to see still capturing a lot of air time is “who’s going to pay for all this bandwidth?”  The topic was connected TVs and the propensity for web video and BBC’s iPlayer et al to realistically transition to the TV in an acceptable form for the consumer.


But I just don’t get this.  Less than five years ago I sat in similar conferences and the debate was the propensity for telephony and players like Skype to realistically transition to internet in an acceptable form for the consumer.  The view was that the traffic will bring down the internet and that the quality will be poor, with calls interrupted by constant packet delays, loss or overload.  Yet here we are running business conference calls over Skype because it’s clearer (and of course cheaper) than either a landline or mobile facility.


I accept that you can’t overcome the laws of physics that dictate the quality of the last bit of wire into the home, and that that wire just can’t handle the simultaneous streaming of multiple high definition video services, but even this ignores two very important aspects that pay no respect to obstacles; progress and ingenuity.


Progress.  Whilst we wander around shows and debate at conferences, progress is being made.  Video codecs will continue to advance, ISPs will prioritise traffic to suit applications, complimentary mobile applications will allow advanced programming and more convenience to the consumer which combined with analytical preferences and recommendations will predetermine push VoD assets – trickle fed on broadcast and broadband downtime.  In other words, clever people will work around the problem and even whilst they do, bandwidth to the home will increase.


Ingenuity.  Apple’s press announcement in November 2009 showed that in excess of 100,000 applications are now available for the iPhone.  That’s a lot of applications, and the number grows daily.  And here’s a thought – how many of those applications have anything to do with making a mobile phone call? Even after removing barriers imposed by Apple on applications like Google Voice, not a lot I’d suggest.  So the idea that a connected TV market is flawed because a flaky over the top broadband connection might just hold it back is frankly daft.  Even if TV were just used for Video, which it won’t be, ingenuity will win through.  Even if the connected TV attracted a 1% equivalent market for applications, of its connected mobile cousin, it would still be a compelling opportunity to address.


TV is changing and it too will simply become an application play. For all the early market repurposing, what is BBC’s iPlayer if not a device independent application?  And the TV application market is truly in its infancy – creating new industry and commerce opportunities as it steps out.


Let’s face it, TV is different.  Television is an instant gratification, remote control, intuitively menu driven experience.  It’s more entertainment and less information, more fun and less work, more long-form engagement than short form notifications and more suggested discovery than search.  These are the requirements for a successful TV service.


TV’s difference creates enormous opportunity for new product and service development over and above – and also complimentary to – PC and mobile internet web services.  As an industry we will create extraordinary things on broadband TVs. What an opportunity to combine the serendipity of TV with the choice of the internet – the editorial challenges and possibilities are immense and highly rewarding for those that get it right.

Posted in Uncategorized, connected TV | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Digital Convergence: Innovation or fragmentation? Or can I retain the serendipity of television?

To me, the most interesting aspect of digital convergence is about how the TV will evolve as it converges with the PC. I should say right now that I don’t want the TV to become just another PC. As a consumer I want more choice, more control and more convenience from television but not at the expense of complexity or a lack of spontaneity. I want to be entertained, in my living room. I want to use a remote control, not a mouse and keyboard. Most of all, I want to retain the simplicity and serendipity of television.
I don’t want to type stuff into a search box before I can watch something. I don’t want a list of programmes that is so long it would take all day to scroll through it. I want relevant programmes suggested to me and I want to watch them whenever I want. I don’t really want to think about how my TV shows me relevant stuff, though I know there’s going to be some clever technology to drive that and I’m happy to share some personal data if I get a relevant experience in return. I don’t want that data to be abused. I’m happy for the brands that I trust to build a direct relationship with me, so long as there is something of interest or value in it for me. If I thought about it for a moment, I suppose I might want to establish a TV personality in the same way that I do on a PC connected to the web. I’m in control, and can build a collection of content, channels, services and maybe even applications that together represent what I want from TV. I want to interact with my friends, my family and communities of interest. And my television must still retain that simplicity and serendipity that makes it so good today.
So what of innovation and fragmentation? I think both are necessary to achieve my vision of the future of television. Fragmentation is inevitable as we enter a world of on demand content, particularly if the route to the consumer is through an open platform like Canvas. More and more brands can establish direct relationships with me – if I choose to let them. Despite the obvious challenges of complexity and navigation, I think this is a good thing. It means I will be able to get whatever I want, whenever I want, from whoever I want, on the best available terms or price and in the most convenient package. I will probably choose a very small subset of the available services that I trust and like and use those regularly. I will probably go outside of these regular services less frequently, though I must be able to do so when I choose. It will be very important to me to be able to get new services when they become cool and not when a single commercial player decides to do a deal with that service. Fragmentation helps to kill off the walled garden, so it is a good thing. Quality is maintained through an open market of competing content and services and not through a single all-powerful aggregator which restricts choice.
Innovation is essential in order to achieve all of this without complexity and dull predictability. We need innovation in how TV is presented to us to keep things simple and relevant. The serendipity of television can be retained if the creative people that commission and schedule live TV now can innovate to evolve their skills and offer interesting choices to me in a personalised on demand world. These skills will need to become more about definition of business rules to target content to smaller and smaller segments of an audience, however the core need to understand the audience as a whole remains. These business rules will take input from this understanding of the audience as well as what I’ve watched before, social trends and community interaction. The innovation is required to deliver “suggested discovery” instead of “search”. My TV won’t be simple without innovation and I don’t want to watch exactly the same type of programming over and over again just because someone’s dumb recommendation engine says so.
So the fragmentation is inevitable and gives me more choice and control. I then need the TV industry to innovate to suggest relevant content and new things that I might like. So to answer the question – Innovation or fragmentation? To achieve simple serendipity in this new converged world, the answer is “both”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

What does Canvas mean to content producers?

Every programme-maker has a desire to entertain, inform, stimulate or sometimes to shock their audience. This is both a creative challenge – “what should I create?” – and a commercial challenge – “how do I pay for it?”
On the face of it, a connected television platform such as Canvas which enables consumers to watch programmes on demand can help to address the second of these two questions. If production companies can deliver their programming to consumers outside of the broadcasters’ acquired rights windows, then there are opportunities to monetise it with advertising or even payment. At best, the traditional broadcast commissioning process “almost” funds the production of content; so on demand services could be an important source of revenue in years to come. Whilst there are many interesting questions about how this can be achieved, including whether to go direct to consumer or through an aggregator and which business model should be used, it is an obvious option to supplement that “almost” funding. Some businesses – including my company, easeltv – will make it easy to deliver and monetise content on Canvas. There are opportunities to build rich interactive services around existing content that will extend its reach and value to all.
Now, what of the creative challenge from our first question – “what should I create?” It is easy to think that you can create the same sort of programmes in the same way as before and now have a way to monetise them more effectively. There is a good incremental benefit to the industry from an enhancement to the current business model. Who wouldn’t want that?
However, this is only part of the opportunity to come from Canvas and other similar internet connected TV initiatives around the world. Whether working with a broadcaster, other aggregator or direct to consumer, content producers now have a chance to fully exploit a genuine two-way environment by delivering more choice and a more relevant experience to consumers. Here lies the opportunity to add a new dimension and breadth to your content that has not been possible before. Some producers and broadcasters already offer consumers the chance to get deeper into their favourite programmes by providing additional content on digital only TV channels, web and mobile. Let’s take this idea a little further. Let’s exploit the interactive and personalised nature of an on demand platform. With internet connected TV platforms such as Canvas you will be able to seamlessly mix broadcast and on demand content. You will be able to add interactivity using low cost web tools and finally move away from today’s horrible, proprietary and clunky interactive TV platforms – which are expensive to develop for – to deliver a high quality two-way experience.
Let’s take an example of a magazine-style programme. I’m sure you will be able to apply this thinking to your own genre and expertise. If you have a collection of stories, these might be assembled by the editorial team into (say) a half-hour programme for a broadcast channel. When you are able to individually address consumers, this half-hour programme might not be half an hour, it could happen at any time and it would almost certainly contain a different collection of stories. Some consumers may want more detail on a particular item, or may want to drill down based on teaser content. Of course some consumers will be fascinated by underwater basket weaving and others won’t be interested. So each consumer could potentially get a different programme that starts whenever they like, lasts who knows how long and contains only stuff that is relevant to them. Consumers will be able to skip the stories that don’t interest them.

The word “relevant” is very important here, and this drives to the heart of the opportunity that connected television offers. You must provide a fresh and relevant consumer experience to your audience.
The most important consideration is to retain the serendipity and simplicity of the TV. Consumer habits are slow to change and whilst, over time, people may get more used to interacting with their TV, the default viewing mode is to sit back and watch. The user experience is very different to the web on a PC. Simple choices, or no choices. Suggested content discovery, not an empty box to type in to search for content. All this requires some important capabilities to be developed:
First, the content must be intelligently sourced and produced so that it can be easily and dynamically repackaged for different audiences and markets. This is a substantial business process challenge as much as it is about editorial, creative, technology and metadata. Each story will have many elements, even on a single platform like TV, as some consumers will want a 30 second overview, some will want a focused 5 minute report and others will want interactive access to a collection of related items.
Second, the editorial and creative skills need to shift from editing a fixed duration programme to building business rules so that a relevant programme can be dynamically assembled based on whatever information is known about the consumer. In many cases, this may start out simply as market driven knowledge – for example we know that viewers in a particular geographic region are likely to be interested in a certain set of stories. What happens beyond that is of course dependent on how content is syndicated and served to individual consumers, however any strategy must aim for being able not just to deliver a personalised programme to consumers but to learn from consumers’ viewing of, and interaction with, those programmes. If a consumer consistently chooses to skip the 5 minute report on underwater basket weaving, then next time they only get the 30 second update. If they keep skipping that, then even the update is excluded unless something important happens. It is possible that social trending analysis of web activity could also be used to make initial suggestions, in order to provide some automation. The definition of these business rules becomes a core skill set for the exploitation of your content. In some ways, these rules become part of the content.
Third, in order to enable the above, you will need a new focus on the end consumer. This again is as much a business process challenge as it is about collecting data. Where content is syndicated, will you have access to consumer data? You don’t need to know every last bit of personal information about who is consuming your content, but you do need to be able to consistently identify a household or individual to provide a relevant experience. Or do you provide tools so that your syndication partners can do this on your behalf? Or do you leave all of this to your syndication partners – including the broadcasters – who will clearly want to build their own consumer relationships?
So what are we left with? There are clearly a lot of unknowns in an evolving market and some significant strategic decisions to take. Well, that may seem pretty scary!
It doesn’t need to be. It’s important to remember that we are at the very beginning of on demand television, so no one is out there doing all this now. The current proprietary pay TV platforms generally have old, clunky technology and most don’t offer anything but movies on demand. These closed platforms are hard to develop for, both commercially and technically. Connected television ultimately offers a larger audience, your choice of business model, a direct relationship with the consumer and low cost web technology and tools to develop with. In the UK, Canvas is the first real opportunity to deliver the next generation of television. The opportunity is out there and, as with most things, production companies would be well advised to keep things simple to start with. It makes sense to start with simple monetisation of existing archive material. Some basic interactivity around this content can be used to keep it fresh and relevant and, crucially, to begin learning about how households interact. As the experience builds, and results are measured, the approach can be evolved to be more ambitious. For now, it is important to consider how to participate in Canvas from day one. This TV revolution is coming to the television in your living room in time for Christmas 2010. Be there or be square-eyed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment